What Inclusive Interviewing Practices Support Equity in Technical Whiteboard Assessments?

To create equitable whiteboard interviews, use clear, jargon-free problems reflecting real-world scenarios; allow flexible timing; foster collaborative dialogue; prioritize problem-solving over memorization; standardize evaluations; offer alternative formats; train interviewers on bias; and encourage candidates to explain their thought process.

To create equitable whiteboard interviews, use clear, jargon-free problems reflecting real-world scenarios; allow flexible timing; foster collaborative dialogue; prioritize problem-solving over memorization; standardize evaluations; offer alternative formats; train interviewers on bias; and encourage candidates to explain their thought process.

Empowered by Artificial Intelligence and the women in tech community.
Like this article?
Contribute to three or more articles across any domain to qualify for the Contributor badge. Please check back tomorrow for updates on your progress.

Use Clear and Accessible Problem Statements

Ensure that whiteboard problems are written in plain language without unnecessary jargon or cultural references that might confuse candidates from diverse backgrounds. Clear instructions help all candidates understand the task without bias introduced by language barriers.

Add your insights

Provide Context and Real-World Relevance

Design whiteboard problems that reflect real-world scenarios relevant to the role. When candidates see practical applications, it reduces abstraction and allows them to demonstrate critical thinking and problem-solving skills more naturally, supporting equitable evaluation.

Add your insights

Allow Adequate Time and Flexibility

Avoid overly strict time limits that might disproportionately disadvantage candidates who need a bit more time to process or explain their thought process. Providing flexibility in timing encourages thoughtful responses over speed, fostering inclusivity.

Add your insights

Encourage a Collaborative Dialogue

Frame the whiteboard session as a conversation rather than a test. Interviewers should engage candidates by asking clarifying questions, offering hints if needed, and encouraging candidates to think aloud, creating an environment where candidates feel supported rather than judged.

Add your insights

Eliminate Reliance on Memorization

Focus on problem-solving approach rather than recall of specific algorithms or syntactic details. Candidates from diverse educational or professional backgrounds may not have memorized standard solutions, so assessing understanding over rote knowledge promotes equity.

Add your insights

Standardize Evaluation Criteria

Use a standardized rubric that clearly defines evaluation criteria such as problem-solving approach, coding style, and communication rather than subjective impressions. This minimizes unconscious bias and ensures candidates are compared fairly.

Add your insights

Offer Alternative Formats When Needed

Be open to alternative assessment formats like take-home assignments or pair programming sessions if candidates have disabilities or learning differences that make traditional whiteboard interviews challenging. Flexibility supports diverse needs without compromising evaluation quality.

Add your insights

Train Interviewers on Bias Recognition

Provide training for interviewers to recognize and mitigate implicit biases during the whiteboard assessment. Awareness helps prevent unfair judgments based on accent, language fluency, or cultural differences, fostering a more equitable interview experience.

Add your insights

Focus on Problem-Solving Process Over Final

Prioritize how candidates approach the problem, including how they break it down, ask questions, and adapt their strategy, rather than only whether they arrive at a correct solution. This broader perspective supports equity by valuing diverse thinking styles.

Add your insights

Encourage Candidates to Explain Their Thought Process

Invite candidates to verbalize their reasoning step-by-step. This practice allows interviewers to assess understanding even if coding syntax isn’t perfect, supports transparency, and reduces anxiety, creating a more inclusive and equitable environment.

Add your insights

What else to take into account

This section is for sharing any additional examples, stories, or insights that do not fit into previous sections. Is there anything else you'd like to add?

Add your insights

Interested in sharing your knowledge ?

Learn more about how to contribute.

Sponsor this category.