Supreme Court Rulings on LGBTQ Employment Protections

Recent rulings, such as Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), interpret Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity. These decisions mandate that tech employers adopt inclusive hiring practices protecting LGBTQ+ individuals.

Recent rulings, such as Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), interpret Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity. These decisions mandate that tech employers adopt inclusive hiring practices protecting LGBTQ+ individuals.

Empowered by Artificial Intelligence and the women in tech community.
Like this article?

What Legal Requirements Exist for Inclusive Job Postings?

Interested in sharing your knowledge ?

Learn more about how to contribute.

Sponsor this category.

More articles on What Legal Requirements Exist for Inclusive Job Postings?

See all

More articles from related categories

How Can Structured Interview Frameworks Help Improve Interview Inclusivity Reporting?
How Do You Track and Report on Interview Inclusivity?
How Can Structured Interview Frameworks Promote Fairness for Women in Tech?
How Employers Can Build Inclusive Interview Processes
How Do Data Privacy Regulations Affect the Administration of Returnship and Re-entry Programs?
Which Local or Federal Regulations Apply to Returnship and Re-entry Programs?
What Key Skills Should Effective Interview Training Programs Focus On to Champion Diversity?
Should You Offer Interview Training to Your Team?