What Metrics Should Employers Track to Continuously Improve the Inclusivity and Reach of Their Job Postings?

The content outlines metrics for enhancing hiring inclusivity: tracking applicant demographics, source diversity, and language bias; measuring engagement, completion, hire rates, and time to fill by group; assessing accessibility and candidate feedback; and benchmarking against workforce diversity to improve outreach and equity.

The content outlines metrics for enhancing hiring inclusivity: tracking applicant demographics, source diversity, and language bias; measuring engagement, completion, hire rates, and time to fill by group; assessing accessibility and candidate feedback; and benchmarking against workforce diversity to improve outreach and equity.

Empowered by Artificial Intelligence and the women in tech community.
Like this article?
Contribute to three or more articles across any domain to qualify for the Contributor badge. Please check back tomorrow for updates on your progress.

Applicant Demographics Breakdown

Tracking the demographic details of applicants, such as gender, ethnicity, age, disability status, and veteran status, helps employers identify whether their job postings are reaching a diverse pool. This insight enables adjustments to recruiting channels and job descriptions to better attract underrepresented groups.

Add your insights

Source of Application Metrics

Analyzing which platforms and job boards yield the most diverse applicants allows employers to focus on channels that broaden reach. Monitoring the diversity of sources ensures outreach efforts are effective and inclusive.

Add your insights

Language Inclusivity Assessment

Evaluating the language used in job postings through tools that detect biased or exclusive terms helps make the postings more welcoming. Tracking changes in applicant diversity after language refinement can measure impact.

Add your insights

Job Posting Engagement Rates

Measuring click-through rates and time spent on job listings reveals how appealing and accessible postings are. Low engagement might signal unclear or non-inclusive language that deters candidates.

Add your insights

Application Completion Rates

Monitoring the percentage of candidates who start versus complete applications can uncover barriers in the process that disproportionately affect certain groups. Simplifying the application process may improve inclusivity.

Add your insights

Hire Rate by Demographic Group

Beyond applications, tracking hires across different groups provides insight into potential biases in selection. Comparing these rates can help ensure equitable hiring from the applicant pool.

Add your insights

Candidate Feedback on Job Postings

Collecting qualitative data from candidates about the clarity, tone, and inclusivity of job descriptions informs continuous improvement. Feedback can highlight unseen issues and areas for enhancement.

Add your insights

Accessibility Compliance Metrics

Assessing job postings for compliance with accessibility standards (e.g., screen reader compatibility) ensures that candidates with disabilities can engage fully. Tracking fixes and improvements here supports inclusivity.

Add your insights

Time to Fill Roles Across Demographics

Analyzing whether some groups take longer to progress through the hiring funnel may indicate systemic barriers. Reducing disparities in time to fill supports equitable hiring practices.

Add your insights

Internal Diversity Benchmarking

Comparing applicant demographics to the current workforce diversity highlights gaps in outreach and inclusivity. Tracking this metric guides efforts to attract candidates that reflect organizational diversity goals.

Add your insights

What else to take into account

This section is for sharing any additional examples, stories, or insights that do not fit into previous sections. Is there anything else you'd like to add?

Add your insights

Interested in sharing your knowledge ?

Learn more about how to contribute.

Sponsor this category.